Manbey Grove

Our initial design proposal for managing the mature trees on Manbey Grove.

These changes are designed to provide a safer walking route, and provide more even shade along the length of the road.

We hope you will provide your input by clicking the 'Add a response' button, or stop by our pop-up event on the 28th (see below for more information).

Phases

Phases overview

Phase 1: Consultation

Consultation

July 10, 2026 11:00 PM - September 7, 2026 10:59 PM

Following on from the Kerbside Greening workshops in autumn 2025, where Manbey Grove residents had an opportunity to raise issues and share ideas on the Manbey Grove street environment, the Council has developed some early design proposals to respond to long-standing issues with existing trees.

ManbeyPh1_A3.pdf

(3.2 MB)

15 responses

Stephen Darke15 hours ago If the established trees are diseased, I understand their removal. If they are simply being removed because of root upheaval I'd keep the. While I can completely understand concerns around wheeled access, as the road itself is so quiet now it seems pretty safe to travel along the road itself (there are sufficient drop kerbs). Just a note to say more broadly how great the street looks now. While I would have liked to see some more novel ideas (lavender plantations! an Iron Maiden mural!) it looks so much better than before and feels very safe to walk and cycle down.

Graham Redman2 weeks ago I am grateful for the time and thought put into these proposals. The build outs are something residents have been requesting for some time to resolve the issues with the pavements. I am strongly supportive of introducing more trees and putting them in the street is an appropriate way to gain potential suds type tree pits and prioritise pedestrians on this quiet residential street. A net loss of parking spaces is a perfectly acceptable compromise and I support the reduction in number. I believe the climate emergency also makes it important that all new trees are large shade trees. There should be a variety, and I would like to request that the tree between No 2 and Lavender Street is a Honey Locust, which is another tree on Kew Garden's list of climate suitable trees.I do not support the removal of the tree at No 22. If there is not enough money to pay for another build out there now, or if the reaching a resolution on a suitable design takes too long, then a decision on this tree should be postponed until a future scheme can resolve. Given that the pavement issues on the north side of the street will have been resolved, this seems like an acceptable compromise to retain a healthy and shade providing tree that is providing many tens of thousands of amenity benefits.

User 5779212 weeks ago I am broadly supportive of this plan. Saving as many of the street's trees as possible is important, particularly given the role they play in cooling the street. Building out the pavement around the trees to keep it accessible for all users is a sensible solution.I would ask, however, whether more of the parking provision can be preserved. The street is usually at capacity. A number of houses have removed their front gardens to create driveways, and several of these have also had their kerb dropped, converting a public parking space into a private one. Given this existing pressure on supply, any further reduction should be considered carefully.I understand that Newham Council is currently conducting a parking and kerbside space review, covering supply and demand across the borough. I would ask that this proposal be reassessed in light of the review's findings if possible.

User 5503712 weeks ago I would like additional street parking to be added to the proposal. I do not have a drive and it is often difficult to find a parking space on the road. The number of parking spaces has already been reduced on the street due to the cycle scheme and neighbours illegally converting front gardens into driveways. Parking is important for residents on the street and these shared spaces should not be removed. Perhaps there could be incentives to convert unused driveways back into gardens and add parking spaces back onto the street?

User 6260002 weeks ago We agree with the removal of the tree outside 21 as the arboriculturist has recommended . The roots are still raising the pavement up and our driveway making it unsafe for the public . The same for the tree outside 22 . The tree outside 21 is dying and pieces of the branches are continually falling off in the wind . This is unsafe for the public . Newham council have a duty of care to make the pavement safe . The build outs for the tree 25 will not solve the trees roots continually growing and undermining another pavement . The staggered planting of a variety of trees is a good idea , but they must be maintained on a regular basis so they don’t get out of control .

Gregory Moffatt3 weeks ago

Kerena Fussell3 weeks ago It would never be my preference for mature trees to be removed. However, using Manbey Grove several times a week, I am aware of the damage being done by the trees earmarked for removal. The idea of building out to allow space around the trees is great- and if it could possibly be extended to the trees being proposed for removal, that would be a better option. The other elements of the scheme look great.

User 5489644 weeks ago

Jacqueline Rappoport4 weeks ago

Community Campaigner David Barton4 weeks ago

Noah Shoesmith4 weeks ago

sangeeta sengupta4 weeks ago I am very sad to hear about the proposal to cut down the two trees on Manny Grove.The road is already restricted and appears to be used mainly by local residents. I understand the concern that there is currently not enough space for prams or wheelchair users to pass safely. However, I do not believe cutting down these mature trees is the right solution.Instead, the pavement could be extended around the trees, with the road narrowed so that one vehicle can pass at a time. Manby Grove is a quiet residential road with limited access from both ends, so this could be a practical alternative.These are beautiful, established trees that add character to the road, support wildlife and benefit the local environment. Once they are removed, they cannot easily be replaced.I firmly oppose this proposal and ask the council to explore other options that improve pedestrian and wheelchair access while protecting the trees.

Dee Knoyle4 weeks ago

Anna Sinnott4 weeks ago

Clement Murphy4 weeks ago

Filters

Total posts: 15

There are 15 projects available.

No values available.

Selected zero tag filters.

Events

Past events

Drop-in
Event date: July 28th, 2026 from 2:00 PM to 5:00 PM.
1 Lavender Street
1 registrant
Read more

Manbey Grove

Existing Trees

Early design proposals

Phases

Consultation

15 responses

Unclear why established trees removed

More big trees is good news

Broadly supportive with reservations about parking spaces

I am broadly supportive, the pavements are a problem for people with reduced mobility so happy for these improvements and as long as the trees are being replaced, I think this is apractical solution.

Positive , but have some reservations

Do not like the idea of removing mature trees. What is the justification for this? Are these trees diseased? This scheme should not go ahead as proposed. Keep the trees with the build outs.

Keeping the trees would be preferable

I think it will make walking on the pavement much better. But also would like to point out we also have a tree like this on Louise road that makes it difficult to walk.

Strongly oppose

Retain equal heights, ensure no sap or debris and associated pavements, etc whilst ensuring that any lost trees are replaced with a net gain of two more trees elsewhere with hedgerows reintroduced .

The crossing may not be safe as cars driving may not slow down in time. I see the view as obscured.

Strong Objection to the Proposed Removal of Two Mature Trees on ManbyGrove

I'm new to this project. Given the number of years a tree takes to grow, is it wise to remove a tree in this global warming climate. Any new trees should be sustainable considering climate change.

Like the new build outs around the existing and proposed trees, which prioritise pedestrians. It would be good to understand why two of the trees need to be removed - no justification provided

Not the right solution

Filters

Events

Past events

Drop-in

Manbey Grove

Existing Trees

Early design proposals

Phases

Consultation

15 responses

Unclear why established trees removed

More big trees is good news

Broadly supportive with reservations about parking spaces

I am broadly supportive, the pavements are a problem for people with reduced mobility so happy for these improvements and as long as the trees are being replaced, I think this is apractical solution.

Positive , but have some reservations

Do not like the idea of removing mature trees. What is the justification for this? Are these trees diseased? This scheme should not go ahead as proposed. Keep the trees with the build outs.

Keeping the trees would be preferable

I think it will make walking on the pavement much better. But also would like to point out we also have a tree like this on Louise road that makes it difficult to walk.

Strongly oppose

Retain equal heights, ensure no sap or debris and associated pavements, etc whilst ensuring that any lost trees are replaced with a net gain of two more trees elsewhere with hedgerows reintroduced .

The crossing may not be safe as cars driving may not slow down in time. I see the view as obscured.

Strong Objection to the Proposed Removal of Two Mature Trees on ManbyGrove

I'm new to this project. Given the number of years a tree takes to grow, is it wise to remove a tree in this global warming climate. Any new trees should be sustainable considering climate change.

Like the new build outs around the existing and proposed trees, which prioritise pedestrians. It would be good to understand why two of the trees need to be removed - no justification provided

Not the right solution

Filters

SORT BY

CATEGORIES

STATUS

Events

Past events

Drop-in